Skip to main content

Why can't I talk about women in crime literature without being an 'angry feminist'?

Why are women presented in such undesirable ways in violent/crime/thriller literature? 

And why am I allegedly a massive, righteous feminist for asking this question? 

For anyone reading this who doesn’t know me particularly well, my research focus for my PhD is a critical discussion of how the female gender is employed and manipulated in violent literature. For anyone reading this who doesn’t follow me on Twitter (and therefore doesn’t receive my weekly updates on what book I’m reading at the moment), I’ve recently finished Philip Kerr’s A Philosophical Investigation, and in a lot of ways, it was a good book. The novel is focussed around an alternative future (or at least, it was the future at Kerr’s time of writing; if memory serves right the setting is actually 2013), in which a Lombroso-inspired programme has been set up to identify men who are predisposed to violence - this is all done in the name of avoiding future ‘gynocide’ (the murder of females).  

The concept intrigued me. It raised interesting questions about fictional serial killers, and it also raised interesting questions about philosophy, self-fulfilling prophecies, and a lot of other ideas that I wasn’t truly expecting. Unfortunately, there were one or two other things that I wasn’t expecting either…

For one, I wasn’t expecting a live sex show during which the female on stage inserted a Champagne bottle into her rectum. 

Did that sentence make you cringe? Imagine reading a few paragraphs of that description instead. 

I didn’t, and still don’t, understand the relevance of this particular scene. Nor do I understand why the sirens of a Police car screamed like sex-mad construction workers (it’s a brilliant description but sex, again, really? I bought this book for murder), or why the first-person serial killer narrative scattered throughout the book has to include moments when he virtually violates the female detective working on his case. However, what I really don’t understand is why when the book slips back into the close third-person narrative for the female detective, the narrative voice actually acknowledges how vile the above sex show is. There is - don’t quote me word for word - a comment made about how the detective can’t believe what some men are aroused by, and indeed what some men will sit through. 

So I think what really bugs me here is that, not only is the scene disgusting, base, and mostly unnecessary as far as I can see, the overarching narrative voice actually agrees with the above assessment. 

So why is it even there?

Why does the serial killer virtually violate the female detective?

Why does the serial killer doctor pornographic images of her, and then post them to her?

Why does she have to hide these images from her male colleagues due to embarrassment?

An idea that has been raised a lot - in these early and tentative days of my research, might I add - is that, in our growing demands for gender equality in fiction (or in my case, my growing demand for gender equality in crime fiction), what we’ve actually landed ourselves with is an awful lot of female detectives, which is fine in one way but frustrating in others. Generally speaking, I’m beginning to feel a bit like we either have these really strong, overtly-dominant women who are over-compensating for their gender, or we have these good-at-their-job women who surrounding characters judge as being a good detective, for a woman. 

Okay so this might be something resembling a righteous, anger, feminist riff, but I think that’s allowed. In some respects we are miles ahead of where we all thought we’d be when it comes to women both inside and outside of books, and in other respects - crime fiction is probably a prime example of this, actually - I just feel like we’re miles behind where we could possibly be. Even when someone does break the mould slightly and don a violent female in their work, look at the reasons why these women are violent and you’ll find that typically it’s because of something that their husbands or fathers have done. Unlike violent men who are allowed to commit acts of violence due to their base, biological need to destroy things… apparently.

(PS: if you have examples of violent females in literature, leave me a little note in the comments or even drop me a tweet because I’d love to read more of these!)

I suppose ultimately this is a small rant stirred by the sex show present in Kerr’s publication. It frustrated me that in amongst world-class philosophers, amateur psychology, and the much-loved first-person narrative of a serial killer, Kerr still felt the need to include the occasional debasement of women as well. Perhaps a 1992 reading audience would have been accepting of this, but as a 2015 woman reading the novel, all I really felt was disappointment. 

(And if that makes me an angry feminist, then I’m okay with that.)


Popular posts from this blog

Book Review: In Her Wake by Amanda Jennings

In Her Wake is the recently published novel from Amanda Jennings, released a little earlier this year by the friendly folks over at Orenda Books, and it has been collecting glowing reviews – all of which I have tried to avoid – for weeks on end. Now, having dipped into the book myself, it’s clear to me why. I was around three pages in to this read, in fact, when I turned to my friend next to me and said: ‘Bloody hell, this is going to be a good one.’ The novel follows the story of Bella. A young woman who returns to her family home following the unexpected death of her mother, only to be greeted by a father who is so overcome with guilt and anxiety – perhaps what you’d expect following the loss of a spouse, but certainly not how you’d expect it – that their already strained relationship only worsens in the opening chapters of this book. When Bella’s father, Henry, finally reveals what he’d been holding in for so long, Bella’s world promptly falls apart – and the reader’s heart pr

The Diary of a Whatever I Am Now: Corrupted Hard Drive.

Take a walk with me. We’ll go back to August 2010, late August, when I finally found out that despite my below par A-Level grades, there was a university in the country that was prepared to give me a chance. Praise be to them. Ahead of starting this journey, my generous mother bought me a laptop. A brand spanking new laptop. That my kind and patient sister, and her partner, set up for me and taught me how to use. They deliberately picked something that would suit the university life style – and they were bang on the money in that respect. That laptop lasted I-don’t-care-to-remember how many assignments and a 10,000 word undergraduate dissertation. Let’s not forget, either, that during my first and second summers home from university, I also wrote two “novels” (I use that word in a bland and unimpressed tone, incidentally) that were typed on that same laptop. From there, we moved to postgraduate studies. More assignments and eventually a 25,000 word dissertation. By this point

The Diary of a (former) PhD Student: Now I actually have run out of work.

In case the title of this blog post didn’t give it away, let me clarify: I have handed in my PhD thesis.  I handed it in exactly a week ago, actually, and I would have blogged a brag sooner if not for the fact that the day after my hand-in, a family member was taken into hospital, and the last week has sort of slipped away from me as a result of that. It’s been a while since I gave you an update at all, I know, and the last time we “talked”, I was in this blissfully ignorant place of not having any work to do. Let me catch you up from there:             My readers were wonderful. All of those who read and provided feedback for the book part of the project were insightful, considerate, and careful with their responses. I ironed out technical issues and even one or two final plot holes and so, to those who read the manuscript ahead of hand-in, I cannot and will not ever be able to thank you enough.            My supervisor made me cry. A lot. The “final few twe